🔗 Share this article

In my role as a game master, I traditionally shied away from extensive use of randomization during my Dungeons & Dragons games. My preference was for story direction and session development to be shaped by player choice instead of pure luck. That said, I opted to change my approach, and I'm very happy with the result.

The Spark: Watching 'Luck Rolls'

A popular actual-play show features a DM who often calls for "fate rolls" from the adventurers. He does this by picking a specific dice and outlining possible results tied to the result. While it's essentially no distinct from consulting a random table, these are created spontaneously when a course of events lacks a obvious conclusion.

I decided to try this method at my own table, mainly because it looked novel and offered a departure from my normal practice. The experience were remarkable, prompting me to think deeply about the perennial tension between pre-determination and randomization in a D&D campaign.

An Emotional Session Moment

In a recent session, my players had survived a massive fight. Later, a player inquired after two friendly NPCs—a brother and sister—had made it. Instead of deciding myself, I asked for a roll. I asked the player to roll a d20. The possible results were: on a 1-4, both would perish; a middling roll, only one would die; on a 10+, they survived.

Fate decreed a 4. This led to a incredibly emotional scene where the party found the remains of their friends, forever united in their final moments. The party conducted last rites, which was particularly powerful due to previous story developments. As a final gesture, I improvised that the remains were strangely transformed, containing a spell-storing object. I randomized, the bead's contained spell was exactly what the party required to address another pressing situation. It's impossible to orchestrate these kinds of perfect story beats.

Honing DM Agility

This event led me to ponder if improvisation and thinking on your feet are actually the beating heart of this game. Even if you are a meticulously planning DM, your ability to adapt can rust. Adventurers reliably take delight in derailing the best constructed plots. Therefore, a good DM needs to be able to think quickly and create details in real-time.

Employing similar mechanics is a great way to train these skills without going completely outside your comfort zone. The trick is to apply them for minor decisions that won't drastically alter the campaign's main plot. To illustrate, I would not employ it to decide if the main villain is a secret enemy. But, I would consider using it to determine if the party enter a room just in time to see a key action occurs.

Enhancing Collaborative Storytelling

Spontaneous randomization also helps maintain tension and cultivate the sensation that the story is alive, shaping in reaction to their decisions immediately. It reduces the sense that they are merely pawns in a DM's sole script, thereby enhancing the shared aspect of storytelling.

This philosophy has historically been part of the game's DNA. The game's roots were filled with charts, which fit a game focused on exploration. Even though modern D&D frequently prioritizes plot-driven play, leading many DMs to feel they need exhaustive notes, that may not be the only path.

Achieving the Sweet Spot

It is perfectly nothing wrong with being prepared. Yet, it's also fine no problem with letting go and allowing the dice to guide minor details in place of you. Authority is a significant aspect of a DM's job. We need it to run the game, yet we often struggle to release it, even when doing so could be beneficial.

My final recommendation is this: Don't be afraid of relinquishing a bit of your plan. Experiment with a little chance for smaller outcomes. It may create that the organic story beat is significantly more powerful than anything you would have pre-written on your own.