🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents praising your insights on growing your venture? Do recruiters making contact to explore collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the reason might be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Numerous female professionals participated in a collective professional network test this week after viral posts indicated that switching their profile gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their profiles to include what they called "bro-coded" terminology - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors men who use online business jargon.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which posts appear to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", described remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her reach decrease significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with similar "assertive" style

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my content were more personal - concise and insightful, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Currently, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after seven days, saying "Each day I continued, and results got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants experienced favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in recent months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to unofficial tests where identical posts by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and less controlled."